It was interesting to note what Shirov had to say of Botvinnik: “I decided to adopt it with both colors. In 1988 I was prepared to try it with Black in the World Cadet Championship and before that event I even had the chance to discuss it with …Botninnik himself. To be honest this eas interesting only from a historical point of view.” He then gave a brief discussion of a line where his analysis disagreed with Botvinnik and commented, “…White stands better but convincing the Soviet patriarch of something was always impossible.”
In the introduction Shirov explains, “When annotating the games I have attempted to explain their principle strategic themes, but my favorite subject has always been tactical complexity.” Ha also added how that back in those days he checked variations with Fritz 4 but “…found it useless to point out which moves were suggested by Fritz because when a GM works (with an engine) he has to extract its (best line) from a lot of rubbish…” Of course nowadays engines are a lot better! Shirov wrote, "I have always tried to be not just a tactician--working with a positional player such as Bagirov and studying hard has helped me to develop my own strategic understanding, although chess is nowadays so concrete that pure strategy practically doesn't exist for me."
In reviewing this book John Watson noted “it's quite possible that readers under 1800 may feel disoriented by the lack of elementary instructive support from the author.”
If you like tactics, this book is a gold mine. Oddly enough, many of his most complex games have resolved into endgames and there is an entire section devoted to his endings. Ironically, Shirov believes he's best at endgames.
Volume 2 (1997-2004) is Shirov’s second book of his best games and is written in the same style as the first. The nine page biography section is quite interesting. He talks about his personal life; for example, his ugly divorce: “When I returned to my house in Tarragona I found it empty… That same day I learnt that the main bank account had been ‘cleaned’ by my already ex-wife.” He went on speaking of GM Emil Sutovsky and how Sutovsky didn’t care about Shirov’s personal problems and demanded a bonus. Of Sutovksy he wrote, “This strong Israeli GM happened to be a typical example of the contemporary mercenary attitude, but fortunately he is one of the very few people to whom I had to stop talking for long.”
Shirov’s biggest complaint was Kasparov’s broken agreement to play a title match. In 1998 Shirov defeated Kramnik in a match. Kramnik got paid, but Shirov got nothing. His ‘pay’ was supposed to be a World Championship match with Kasparov with the promise of a big payday. Let Shirov explain. “I received a phone call from Luis Rentero, the match organizer, and he horrified me with the news that my match against Kasparov in Seville was cancelled and nothing similar was being offered in its place. When I told him that it was his obligation, in that case, to pay me two hundred thousand dollars cancellation fee according to the contract signed in March, his answer was that he would eat that contract and didn’t want to compensate me anything.” On the other hand Kramnik, the loser, was rewarded financially and later got to play a match against Kasparov Needless to say all the shenanigans surrounding the championship of that day left Shirov bitter and as a result his play was adversely affected.
In one section entitled “Notes on Creativity” he discusses two positions, one involving
advance home preparation, the other at-the-board inspiration at length. Also, remember his comment about Fritz 4 in Vol, 1? In this volume Fritz appears throughout in Shirov's analysis even though he still rebels against the necessity of using one.