I
was looking over this one the other day and can only say, it’s honest to
goodness garbage. First of all it’s
pretty well known Reshevsky didn’t write most (if any) of the books attributed
to him despite his claims otherwise. I doubt he wrote this one either and judging
from some of the statements made in the book, Reshevsky’s memory was really bad
or whoever wrote the book had a very limited knowledge of chess history. Even
Reshevsky's chapter on himself has some inconsistencies.
The
book is a collection of games by great players and is accompanied by brief
biographical sketches. There are seventeen
players from Adolf Anderssen to Anatoly Karpov and includes all the world
champions up to 1976.
In
any case, most of the games hardly qualify as upsets. Seriously, who would
consider Lasker losing to Rubinstein an upset?
Or Capablanca to Alekhine? And the book is full of such games.
I am appalled! |
Careless
editing is rampant. For example, it
seems the editor was not sure how spell ‘en prise’ because it is spelled
several different ways. One game is appears twice…Alekhine-Euwe from
the World Championship match; the really funny thing is it has different notes.
Another
stupid error…It says that Keres "still participates in numerous chess
competitions and will probably continue to do so for many years." The book
was printed in 1976 but Keres died in 1975. Also, I’ll bet you didn’t know Korchnoi
got GM title in 1956 then the IM title in 1963. At least that’s what the book
says. What? Did he get busted from GM to IM? According to the book, "The height of
Smyslov's career came in 1957 in the return match against Botvinnik. The height of his career was losing the world championship?! Other
stupid errors abound.
The
chapter on Fischer does not mention his resigning his world title. At the same time the book does mention the result of the
Korchnoi-Karpov Candidates Match which was played after Fischer resigned. And no
mention is made of FIDE declaring Karpov World Champion. I could go on, but won’t.
Save
your money. If you see it at the
library, pass it up.
No comments:
Post a Comment